<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Unlimited Rice Pudding!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Matty</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>Matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>I think Moffat sat down with the Beeb and had a big old talk about the drop-off in viewing figures at the end of series five. Yes, 6 million is still perfectly good for a Saturday night drama and, yes, lots of people watch it on iPlayer now instead and it shouldn&#039;t really matter but to a lot of people and, crucially, that includes the media, overnights are all-important. By moving the series away from summer and the long, warm, nights I expect Moffat is hoping to show that the drop-off was nothing to do with his showrunning. It&#039;s a pragmatic way of keeping the show on track and keeping the Beeb&#039;s faith in it (because, in an age of austerity and a Beeb-hostile coalition in power at Westminster the corporation is going to be nervous about expensive productions).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Moffat sat down with the Beeb and had a big old talk about the drop-off in viewing figures at the end of series five. Yes, 6 million is still perfectly good for a Saturday night drama and, yes, lots of people watch it on iPlayer now instead and it shouldn&#8217;t really matter but to a lot of people and, crucially, that includes the media, overnights are all-important. By moving the series away from summer and the long, warm, nights I expect Moffat is hoping to show that the drop-off was nothing to do with his showrunning. It&#8217;s a pragmatic way of keeping the show on track and keeping the Beeb&#8217;s faith in it (because, in an age of austerity and a Beeb-hostile coalition in power at Westminster the corporation is going to be nervous about expensive productions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Ridley</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>Ridley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>Hello and congratulations. Your television programme has been specially selected in our Wednesday draw and you have definately won a major surprise. Perhaps even our star surprise of a MASSIVE placht.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello and congratulations. Your television programme has been specially selected in our Wednesday draw and you have definately won a major surprise. Perhaps even our star surprise of a MASSIVE placht.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2526</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2526</guid>
		<description>My money says this is 90% practical, production thinking and very little to do with storytelling.

There may well be a cliffhanger of awesomeness, but I&#039;m betting it went &quot;last series had trouble -&gt; production would benefit from a break in broadcast -&gt; well, if we&#039;re breaking, we&#039;d better have a great story to do it with.&quot;

I&#039;ve no doubt that Moffat can make the best of production necessity, write scrips that thrive on limitations. But I seriously doubt the pause is mostly about letting a twist have lasting impact. Who schedules for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My money says this is 90% practical, production thinking and very little to do with storytelling.</p>
<p>There may well be a cliffhanger of awesomeness, but I&#8217;m betting it went &#8220;last series had trouble -&gt; production would benefit from a break in broadcast -&gt; well, if we&#8217;re breaking, we&#8217;d better have a great story to do it with.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve no doubt that Moffat can make the best of production necessity, write scrips that thrive on limitations. But I seriously doubt the pause is mostly about letting a twist have lasting impact. Who schedules for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Andy M</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>As long as there&#039;s a scene spoofing Bladerunner, I&#039;m sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as there&#8217;s a scene spoofing Bladerunner, I&#8217;m sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Hendiadys</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2523</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendiadys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2523</guid>
		<description>Plot twist:  Suddenly, the cast of Doctor Who are catapulted to the beginning of the twenty first century, where they discover that they are characters in a popular science fiction series for kids!!  Ending with the lines (after the series split/ mega cliffhanger):  &quot;And you know what they&#039;d do if you told them?&quot;  &quot;They&#039;d hide behind the sofa!&quot;  &quot;Yes, but only because people find The League of Gentlemen scary, LOL!&quot;  &quot;LOL!&quot;

*awaits five pounds*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plot twist:  Suddenly, the cast of Doctor Who are catapulted to the beginning of the twenty first century, where they discover that they are characters in a popular science fiction series for kids!!  Ending with the lines (after the series split/ mega cliffhanger):  &#8220;And you know what they&#8217;d do if you told them?&#8221;  &#8220;They&#8217;d hide behind the sofa!&#8221;  &#8220;Yes, but only because people find The League of Gentlemen scary, LOL!&#8221;  &#8220;LOL!&#8221;</p>
<p>*awaits five pounds*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Andy M</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There will be less of an prolonged build-up to a single, pompous finale (hooray) and at the mid point we’ll feel that something is actually at stake (hooray)&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Interesting way of looking at it. This is exactly what I was hoping Tennant&#039;s swansong year would be: in the end it wasn&#039;t the poor quality of those episodes that was disappointing, it was the wasted opportunity to play with the format in a way the show hadn&#039;t since Pertwee&#039;s first season. Maybe the Moff can do it properly but the crack arc wasn&#039;t good enough for me to get too excited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There will be less of an prolonged build-up to a single, pompous finale (hooray) and at the mid point we’ll feel that something is actually at stake (hooray)</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting way of looking at it. This is exactly what I was hoping Tennant&#8217;s swansong year would be: in the end it wasn&#8217;t the poor quality of those episodes that was disappointing, it was the wasted opportunity to play with the format in a way the show hadn&#8217;t since Pertwee&#8217;s first season. Maybe the Moff can do it properly but the crack arc wasn&#8217;t good enough for me to get too excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Hendiadys</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2479</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendiadys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2479</guid>
		<description>That sun with sunglasses was supposed to be an eight followed by a closing parenthesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sun with sunglasses was supposed to be an eight followed by a closing parenthesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Hendiadys</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2478</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendiadys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2478</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I really don’t want more event episodes, I would like more of the well-written ones instead.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think there&#039;s always going to be a question mark over what an &quot;event episode&quot; is, though.  For me, the Dalek episode in series 5 was an &quot;event episode&quot;, because all the interesting detective thriller stuff was abandoned after fifteen minutes to make way for some kind of Superman guff.  The series finale was only an &quot;event&quot; because the rest of the series kept pointing to it, with so many references to the &quot;cracks&quot; feeling contrived and awkward.

There&#039;s a real chance that despite there being &quot;two openings and two finales&quot;, or however Moffat put it, there will actually be less of a sense of &quot;event&quot; in the RTD sense.  There will be less of an prolonged build-up to a single, pompous finale (hooray) and at the mid point (let&#039;s say, for the sake of argument, taking the place of the lumpen Silurian effort this year, even though that wasn&#039;t episodes 7 and 8) we&#039;ll feel that something is actually &lt;b&gt;at stake&lt;/b&gt; (hooray).  If Moffat is writing these episodes, then I suspect they&#039;ll be crafted well, and the chances are he&#039;ll feel free to dispense with other &quot;events&quot; like &lt;b&gt;spitfires in space&lt;/b&gt; which served only to liven things up between the opening and the finale.

In the end, it&#039;s very possible that doing this will create room for more of the non-event episodes we want.  Plus, half of the series will be in Autumn.  Possibly freeing Moffat, tonally, from the &quot;summer blockbuster&quot; notion of &quot;event episodes&quot;.  We&#039;ll see anyway, but I&#039;m quite positive about all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I really don’t want more event episodes, I would like more of the well-written ones instead.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think there&#8217;s always going to be a question mark over what an &#8220;event episode&#8221; is, though.  For me, the Dalek episode in series 5 was an &#8220;event episode&#8221;, because all the interesting detective thriller stuff was abandoned after fifteen minutes to make way for some kind of Superman guff.  The series finale was only an &#8220;event&#8221; because the rest of the series kept pointing to it, with so many references to the &#8220;cracks&#8221; feeling contrived and awkward.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a real chance that despite there being &#8220;two openings and two finales&#8221;, or however Moffat put it, there will actually be less of a sense of &#8220;event&#8221; in the RTD sense.  There will be less of an prolonged build-up to a single, pompous finale (hooray) and at the mid point (let&#8217;s say, for the sake of argument, taking the place of the lumpen Silurian effort this year, even though that wasn&#8217;t episodes 7 and <img src='http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> we&#8217;ll feel that something is actually <b>at stake</b> (hooray).  If Moffat is writing these episodes, then I suspect they&#8217;ll be crafted well, and the chances are he&#8217;ll feel free to dispense with other &#8220;events&#8221; like <b>spitfires in space</b> which served only to liven things up between the opening and the finale.</p>
<p>In the end, it&#8217;s very possible that doing this will create room for more of the non-event episodes we want.  Plus, half of the series will be in Autumn.  Possibly freeing Moffat, tonally, from the &#8220;summer blockbuster&#8221; notion of &#8220;event episodes&#8221;.  We&#8217;ll see anyway, but I&#8217;m quite positive about all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Nick R</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>Steven Moffat has also commented on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/cult/s7/doctor-who/news/a269483/moffat-no-daleks-in-next-who-series.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;prevalence of certain major recurring villain(s)&lt;/a&gt; in the next series. &#039;Tis good news!

Also, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/dw/theadventuregames/download/tardis&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new adventure game episode&lt;/a&gt; was released a few days ago. Haven&#039;t tried it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven Moffat has also commented on the <a href="http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/cult/s7/doctor-who/news/a269483/moffat-no-daleks-in-next-who-series.html" rel="nofollow">prevalence of certain major recurring villain(s)</a> in the next series. &#8216;Tis good news!</p>
<p>Also, a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/dw/theadventuregames/download/tardis" rel="nofollow">new adventure game episode</a> was released a few days ago. Haven&#8217;t tried it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why don&#8217;t you make like a tree, and split? by Andy M</title>
		<link>http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/2010/08/why-dont-you-make-like-a-tree-and-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlimitedricepudding.co.uk/?p=831#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t want more event episodes, I would like more of the well-written ones instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t want more event episodes, I would like more of the well-written ones instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
